Ho scritto una funzione interessante in F # che può attraversare e mappare qualsiasi struttura dati (proprio come la funzione di tutto il mondo disponibile in Haskell's Scrap Your Boilerplate). Sfortunatamente provoca un overflow dello stack anche su strutture di dati abbastanza piccole. Mi stavo chiedendo come posso convertirlo in una versione ricorsiva di coda, una versione di stile a passaggio continuo o un algoritmo equivalente imperativo. Credo che F # supporti le monadi, quindi la monade di continuazione è un'opzione.Come posso fare in modo che questa funzione F # non causi uno stack overflow
// These are used for a 50% speedup
let mutable tupleReaders : List<System.Type * (obj -> obj[])> = []
let mutable unionTagReaders : List<System.Type * (obj -> int)> = []
let mutable unionReaders : List<(System.Type * int) * (obj -> obj[])> = []
let mutable unionCaseInfos : List<System.Type * Microsoft.FSharp.Reflection.UnionCaseInfo[]> = []
let mutable recordReaders : List<System.Type * (obj -> obj[])> = []
(*
Traverses any data structure in a preorder traversal
Calls f, g, h, i, j which determine the mapping of the current node being considered
WARNING: Not able to handle option types
At runtime, option None values are represented as null and so you cannot determine their runtime type.
See http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21855356/dynamically-determine-type-of-option-when-it-has-value-none
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13366647/how-to-generalize-f-option
*)
open Microsoft.FSharp.Reflection
let map5<'a,'b,'c,'d,'e,'z> (f:'a->'a) (g:'b->'b) (h:'c->'c) (i:'d->'d) (j:'e->'e) (src:'z) =
let ft = typeof<'a>
let gt = typeof<'b>
let ht = typeof<'c>
let it = typeof<'d>
let jt = typeof<'e>
let rec drill (o:obj) : obj =
if o = null then
o
else
let ot = o.GetType()
if FSharpType.IsUnion(ot) then
let tag = match List.tryFind (fst >> ot.Equals) unionTagReaders with
| Some (_, reader) ->
reader o
| None ->
let newReader = FSharpValue.PreComputeUnionTagReader(ot)
unionTagReaders <- (ot, newReader)::unionTagReaders
newReader o
let info = match List.tryFind (fst >> ot.Equals) unionCaseInfos with
| Some (_, caseInfos) ->
Array.get caseInfos tag
| None ->
let newCaseInfos = FSharpType.GetUnionCases(ot)
unionCaseInfos <- (ot, newCaseInfos)::unionCaseInfos
Array.get newCaseInfos tag
let vals = match List.tryFind (fun ((tau, tag'), _) -> ot.Equals tau && tag = tag') unionReaders with
| Some (_, reader) ->
reader o
| None ->
let newReader = FSharpValue.PreComputeUnionReader info
unionReaders <- ((ot, tag), newReader)::unionReaders
newReader o
FSharpValue.MakeUnion(info, Array.map traverse vals)
elif FSharpType.IsTuple(ot) then
let fields = match List.tryFind (fst >> ot.Equals) tupleReaders with
| Some (_, reader) ->
reader o
| None ->
let newReader = FSharpValue.PreComputeTupleReader(ot)
tupleReaders <- (ot, newReader)::tupleReaders
newReader o
FSharpValue.MakeTuple(Array.map traverse fields, ot)
elif FSharpType.IsRecord(ot) then
let fields = match List.tryFind (fst >> ot.Equals) recordReaders with
| Some (_, reader) ->
reader o
| None ->
let newReader = FSharpValue.PreComputeRecordReader(ot)
recordReaders <- (ot, newReader)::recordReaders
newReader o
FSharpValue.MakeRecord(ot, Array.map traverse fields)
else
o
and traverse (o:obj) =
let parent =
if o = null then
o
else
let ot = o.GetType()
if ft = ot || ot.IsSubclassOf(ft) then
f (o :?> 'a) |> box
elif gt = ot || ot.IsSubclassOf(gt) then
g (o :?> 'b) |> box
elif ht = ot || ot.IsSubclassOf(ht) then
h (o :?> 'c) |> box
elif it = ot || ot.IsSubclassOf(it) then
i (o :?> 'd) |> box
elif jt = ot || ot.IsSubclassOf(jt) then
j (o :?> 'e) |> box
else
o
drill parent
traverse src |> unbox : 'z
Può fare un esempio, dove si hanno in corso overflow dello stack? –